| Motto: Knowing one's own situation and that of enemy guarantees victory in every battles. |
|||||
| 知己知彼,百戰百勝! | V 1.0 | ||||
|
West |
2015 FINALS |
East |
||||||
4-0 |
4-2 |
4-1 |
108 : 100 OT |
4-0 |
4-2 |
4-2 |
Atlanta |
|
93 : 95 OT |
Brooklyn |
|||||||
4-1 |
91 : 96 |
4-0 |
Toronto |
|||||
103 : 82 |
Washington |
|||||||
4-3 |
4-3 |
4-2 |
4-2 |
Chicago |
||||
104 : 91 |
Milwaukee |
|||||||
4-1 |
105 : 97 |
4-0 |
Cleveland |
|||||
: |
Boston |
|||||||
| 短評:勇士的Curry狀態正處於巔峰路上,季後賽3分球已破前輩們的記錄,隊友也穩定地相輔出手,總冠軍之盃是早晚到手。東區第一種子老鷹缺乏季後賽經驗,遇到高壓對抗性強的騎士,主場打得像二軍隊伍,慘不忍睹。當今籃球皇帝[雷霸龍]一支獨秀,大內高手[Kenvin Love]因傷高掛免戰牌,騎士孤掌難鳴更難抵禦三分球雨的勇士及打法花俏難防守的浪花兄弟,勇士經過40年再度擁戴金盃。4/19~6/17。我有話說 | ||||||||
|
West |
2014 FINALS |
East |
||||||
4-3 |
4-1 |
4-2 |
110 : 95 |
4-2 |
4-2 |
4-3 |
Indiana |
|
96 : 98 |
Atlanta |
|||||||
4-2 |
111 : 92 |
4-1 |
Chicago |
|||||
107 : 86 |
Washington |
|||||||
4-3 |
4-2 |
4-1 |
4-3 |
Toronto |
||||
104 : 87 |
Brooklyn |
|||||||
4-3 |
: |
4-0 |
Miami |
|||||
: |
Charlotte |
|||||||
| 短評:今年NBA季後賽整體上明顯地西強東弱;西區無緣進八強季後賽的隊伍在東區竟可排名於第四(勝率超過五成)。溜馬原可當熱火絆腳石或奪冠,怎知鬧起內鬨搞不合。衛冕的熱火雷暴龍也患起大頭症;總冠軍未到手就放話:下季何處有奶,誰就是媽。隊友會真賣命拼衛冕嗎?還是樸實不奢華的馬刺,不疾不徐的打自己球風,穩扎穩打再度贏得總冠軍,不愧為黑衫王朝。4/20~6/16。我有話說 | ||||||||
|
West |
2013 FINALS |
East |
||||||
4-2 |
4-1 |
4-0 |
92 : 88 |
4-3 |
4-1 |
4-0 |
Miami |
|
84 : 103 |
Milwaukee |
|||||||
4-2 |
113 : 77 |
4-3 |
Brooklyn |
|||||
93 : 109 |
Chicago |
|||||||
4-2 |
4-2 |
4-2 |
4-2 |
Indiana |
||||
114 : 104 |
Atlanta |
|||||||
4-0 |
100 : 103 |
4-2 |
New York |
|||||
88 : 95 |
Boston |
|||||||
| 短評:今年NBA總冠軍由治軍嚴謹的馬刺教主石佛Duncan挑戰衛冕的熱火,熱火眾星雲集原三巨頭LCD外,又多一三分老將Ray Allen(原塞爾蒂克)備援,第六戰將熱火從馬刺手中死裡逃生。或許巨星眼中較難接受他人閃亮驚人之舉(高得分);不懂得傳球及分享得分,否則如此奢華的熱火竟連東區冠軍戰也殺至第七戰。若要成為NBA新王朝,總教練需先教會巨星們的打球心態:打球是靠頭腦,不是靠體力。但黑朋友懂嗎?4/21~6/21。我有話說 | ||||||||
|
West |
2012 FINALS |
East |
||||||
4-0 |
4-0 |
4-2 |
105 : 94 |
4-3 |
4-3 |
4-2 |
Chicago |
|
96 : 100 |
Philadelphia |
|||||||
4-3 |
85 : 91 |
4-2 |
Boston |
|||||
98 : 104 |
Atlanta |
|||||||
4-3 |
4-1 |
4-2 |
4-1 |
Indiana |
||||
106 : 121 |
Orlando |
|||||||
4-0 |
: |
4-1 |
Miami |
|||||
New York |
||||||||
| 短評:季後賽不只比球技,更比體力及耐操度;公牛因主將Rose賽中受傷,季後賽說Bye Bye,戰績第一的馬刺因體力尬不過年輕的雷霆,雷霆缺乏季後賽經驗(無法掌握主場優勢)失去大江山;雷霆前半場落後,後起直追逆轉秀哪有隨隊所欲?因罷工縮短賽事4/29~6/22。我有話說 | ||||||||
|
West |
2011 FINALS |
East |
||||||
4-2 |
4-3 |
4-1 |
84 : 92 |
4-1 |
4-2 |
4-1 |
Chicago |
|
95 : 93 |
Indiana |
|||||||
4-1 |
86 : 88 |
4-2 |
Orlando |
|||||
86 : 83 |
Atlanta |
|||||||
4-2 |
4-0 |
4-1 |
4-0 |
Boston |
||||
112 : 103 |
New York |
|||||||
4-2 |
105 : 95 |
4-1 |
Miami |
|||||
Philadelphia |
||||||||
| 短評:總冠軍賽直玩逆轉秀,主場總保不住優勢,是假球?還是一代不如一代?最後一場證明不是假球,而且說明為求冠軍戒指而硬湊一隊稱為烏合之眾。4/17~6/13 | ||||||||
|
West |
2010 FINALS |
East |
||||||
4-2 |
4-0 |
4-2 |
102 : 89 |
4-2 |
4-2 |
4-1 |
Cleveland |
|
94 : 103 |
Chicago |
|||||||
4-2 |
91 : 84 |
4-1 |
Boston |
|||||
89 : 96 |
Miami |
|||||||
4-2 |
4-0 |
4-0 |
4-3 |
Atlanta |
||||
86 : 92 |
Milwaukee |
|||||||
4-2 |
89 : 67 |
4-0 |
Orlando |
|||||
83 : 79 |
Charlotte |
|||||||
|
West |
2009 FINALS |
East |
||||||
4-1 |
4-3 |
4-2 |
100 : 75 |
4-2 |
4-0 |
4-0 |
Cleveland |
|
101 : 96 |
Detroit |
|||||||
4-2 |
104 : 108 |
4-3 |
Atlanta |
|||||
99 : 91 |
Miami |
|||||||
4-1 |
4-1 |
4-3 |
4-2 |
Orlando |
||||
99 : 86 |
Philadelphia |
|||||||
4-1 |
4-3 |
Boston |
||||||
Chicago |
||||||||
|
West |
2008 FINALS |
East |
||||||
4-0 |
4-2 |
4-1 |
88 : 98 |
4-2 |
4-3 |
4-3 |
Boston |
|
102 : 108 |
Atlanta |
|||||||
4-2 |
87 : 81 |
4-2 |
Cleveland |
|||||
91 : 97 |
Washington |
|||||||
4-1 |
4-3 |
4-1 |
4-1 |
Orlando |
||||
103 : 98 |
Toronto |
|||||||
4-1 |
92 : 131 |
4-2 |
Detroit |
|||||
Philadelphia |
||||||||
|
West |
2007 FINALS |
East |
||||||
4-2 |
4-1 |
4-1 |
85 : 76 |
4-2 |
4-2 |
4-0 |
Detroit |
|
103 : 92 |
Orlando |
|||||||
4-3 |
75 : 72 |
4-0 |
Miami |
|||||
83 : 82 |
Chicago |
|||||||
4-1 |
4-2 |
4-2 |
4-2 |
Toronto |
||||
New Jersey |
||||||||
4-1 |
4-0 |
Cleveland |
||||||
Washington |
||||||||
West |
2006 FINALS |
East |
||||||
| 1.San Antonio | San Antonio 4-2 |
Dallas 4-3 |
Dallas 4-2 |
90 : 80 |
Miami 4-2 |
Detroit 4-3 |
Detroit 4-1 |
Detroit |
| 8.Sacramento | 99 : 85 |
Milwaukee |
||||||
| 4.Dallas | Dallas 4-0 |
96 : 98 |
Cleveland 4-2 |
Cleveland |
||||
| 5.Memphis | 74 : 98 |
Washington |
||||||
| 3.Denver | LA Clippers 4-1 |
Phoenix 4-3 |
Miami 4-1 |
New Jersey 4-2 |
New Jersey |
|||
| 6.LA Clippers | 100 : 101 |
Indiana |
||||||
| 2.Phoenix | Phoenix 4-3 |
92 : 95 |
Miami 4-2 |
Miami |
||||
| 7.LA Lakers | Chicago |
|||||||
West |
2005 FINALS |
East |
||||||
| 1.Phoenix | Phoenix 4:0 |
Phoenix 4:2 |
San Antonio 4:1 |
84:69 |
Detroit 4:3 |
Miami 4:0 |
Miami 4:0 |
Miami |
| 8.Memphis | 97:76 |
New Jersey |
||||||
| 4.Dallas | Dallas 4:3 |
79:96 |
Washington 4:2 |
Chicago |
||||
| 5.Houston | Washington |
|||||||
| 3.Seattle | Seattle 4:1 |
San Antonio 4:2 |
71:102 |
Detroit 4:2 |
Indiana 4:2 |
Boston |
||
| 6.Sacramento | 96:95 |
Indiana |
||||||
| 2.San Antonio | San Antonio 4:1 |
86:95 |
Detroit 4:1 |
Detroit |
||||
| 7.Denver | 81:74 |
Philadelphia |
||||||
West |
2004 FINALS |
East |
||||||
| 1.Minnesota | Minnesota 4:1 |
Minnesota 4:3 |
LA Lakers 4:2 |
Detroit 4:2 |
Indiana 4:2 |
Indiana 4:0 |
Indiana |
|
| 8.Denver | Boston |
|||||||
| 4.Sacramento | Sacramento 4:1 |
Miami 4:3 |
Miami |
|||||
| 5.Dallas | New Orleans |
|||||||
| 3.San Antonio | San Antonio 4:0 |
LA Lakers 4:2 |
4:1 |
Detroit 4:3 |
Detroit 4:1 |
Detroit |
||
| 6.Memphis | Milwaukee |
|||||||
| 2.LA Lakers | LA Lakers 4:1 |
New Jersey 4:0 |
New Jersey |
|||||
| 7.Houston | New York |
|||||||
West |
2003 FINALS |
East |
||||||
| 1.San Antonio | San Antonio 4:2 |
San Antonio 4:2 |
San Antonio 4:2 |
New Jersey 4:0 |
Detroit 4:2 |
Detroit 4:3 |
Detroit |
|
| 8.Phoenix | Orlando |
|||||||
| 4.Minnesota | LA Lakers 4:2 |
Philadelphia 4:2 |
Philadelphia |
|||||
| 5.LA Lakers | New Orleans |
|||||||
| 3.Dallas | Dallas 4:3 |
Dallas 4:3 |
4:2 |
New Jersey 4:0 |
Boston 4:2 |
Indiana |
||
| 6.Portland | Boston |
|||||||
| 2.Sacramento | Sacramento 4:1 |
New Jersey 4:2 |
New Jersey |
|||||
| 7.Utah | Milwaukee |
|||||||